<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SearchDotNet.com â€“ Google custom search for .NET developers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danappleman.com/index.php?feed=rss2&#038;p=49" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danappleman.com/?p=49</link>
	<description>Analysis and commentary on technology issues and others</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:30:51 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sudhir Mangla</title>
		<link>http://www.danappleman.com/?p=49&#038;cpage=1#comment-158900</link>
		<dc:creator>Sudhir Mangla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danappleman.com/?p=49#comment-158900</guid>
		<description>Hi I would like to mention another search engine for dot net developers which cover all good sites for dot net and related technologies as of August, 2008.

http://tips.developersvoice.com/devsearch

This developers search engine is inspired by searchdotnet.com and I try my best achieve even batter results. Both these developers search engines would greatly help the developerâ€™s community.

DO test it yourself and let me know your comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I would like to mention another search engine for dot net developers which cover all good sites for dot net and related technologies as of August, 2008.</p>
<p><a href="http://tips.developersvoice.com/devsearch" rel="nofollow">http://tips.developersvoice.com/devsearch</a></p>
<p>This developers search engine is inspired by searchdotnet.com and I try my best achieve even batter results. Both these developers search engines would greatly help the developerâ€™s community.</p>
<p>DO test it yourself and let me know your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.danappleman.com/?p=49&#038;cpage=1#comment-89033</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 19:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danappleman.com/?p=49#comment-89033</guid>
		<description>Allan:

It&#039;s something I considered. Part of the problem is, believe it or not, there is no easy way to currently export sites from a Google Custom Search Engine. So I&#039;d have to maintain two lists. For now, you can check by doing a search that starts with &quot;site: ...&quot; - that restricts searches to a single site.

Most of the time I add sites when, after having failed to find what I&#039;m looking for on searchdotnet, I end up finding a solution elsewhere. That&#039;s a good sign that the &quot;elsewhere&quot; site should be included.

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allan:</p>
<p>It&#8217;s something I considered. Part of the problem is, believe it or not, there is no easy way to currently export sites from a Google Custom Search Engine. So I&#8217;d have to maintain two lists. For now, you can check by doing a search that starts with &#8220;site: &#8230;&#8221; &#8211; that restricts searches to a single site.</p>
<p>Most of the time I add sites when, after having failed to find what I&#8217;m looking for on searchdotnet, I end up finding a solution elsewhere. That&#8217;s a good sign that the &#8220;elsewhere&#8221; site should be included.</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://www.danappleman.com/?p=49&#038;cpage=1#comment-89006</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 05:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danappleman.com/?p=49#comment-89006</guid>
		<description>Great job,

Can I request that the sites that ARE included in the searchable sites be included in a seperate page so that people wanting to make recommendations can do so safe in the knowledge that the site is not already listed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job,</p>
<p>Can I request that the sites that ARE included in the searchable sites be included in a seperate page so that people wanting to make recommendations can do so safe in the knowledge that the site is not already listed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paulo Cunha</title>
		<link>http://www.danappleman.com/?p=49&#038;cpage=1#comment-88212</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulo Cunha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 11:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danappleman.com/?p=49#comment-88212</guid>
		<description>This is very good.

I&#039;ve a suggestion, though: what about a custom button for Google Toolbar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very good.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve a suggestion, though: what about a custom button for Google Toolbar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.danappleman.com/?p=49&#038;cpage=1#comment-85876</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danappleman.com/?p=49#comment-85876</guid>
		<description>Great idea - Google homepage and desktop widgets are now available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea &#8211; Google homepage and desktop widgets are now available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ade</title>
		<link>http://www.danappleman.com/?p=49&#038;cpage=1#comment-85620</link>
		<dc:creator>Ade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danappleman.com/?p=49#comment-85620</guid>
		<description>Excellent!
A little google homepage widget would be a nice addition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent!<br />
A little google homepage widget would be a nice addition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjan Zuidhof</title>
		<link>http://www.danappleman.com/?p=49&#038;cpage=1#comment-72845</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjan Zuidhof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danappleman.com/?p=49#comment-72845</guid>
		<description>Nice initiative, I will definitely give it a try. Although I know my way around on google.com it tends to be quite time consuming because just scanning the results takes time in itself. 
Tried your engine on Firefox (2.0), where I didn&#039;t get any results back, it&#039;s like there&#039;s a glitch preventing the results from being displayed... it works on IE6. Strange</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice initiative, I will definitely give it a try. Although I know my way around on google.com it tends to be quite time consuming because just scanning the results takes time in itself.<br />
Tried your engine on Firefox (2.0), where I didn&#8217;t get any results back, it&#8217;s like there&#8217;s a glitch preventing the results from being displayed&#8230; it works on IE6. Strange</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.danappleman.com/?p=49&#038;cpage=1#comment-72844</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danappleman.com/?p=49#comment-72844</guid>
		<description>Excellent!!  Very useful.

In addition to Werz&#039;s suggestion, a configurable number of results per page, maybe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent!!  Very useful.</p>
<p>In addition to Werz&#8217;s suggestion, a configurable number of results per page, maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.danappleman.com/?p=49&#038;cpage=1#comment-72829</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danappleman.com/?p=49#comment-72829</guid>
		<description>Dan,

It seems that a number of use created the same thing:

http://weblogs.asp.net/gavinjoyce/archive/2006/10/24/.NET-Search-Engine-_2800_Google-Co_2D00_op_2900_.aspx

Maybe we should join forces somehow?

Gavin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,</p>
<p>It seems that a number of use created the same thing:</p>
<p><a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/gavinjoyce/archive/2006/10/24/.NET-Search-Engine-_2800_Google-Co_2D00_op_2900_.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://weblogs.asp.net/gavinjoyce/archive/2006/10/24/.NET-Search-Engine-_2800_Google-Co_2D00_op_2900_.aspx</a></p>
<p>Maybe we should join forces somehow?</p>
<p>Gavin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SearchDotNet.com</title>
		<link>http://www.danappleman.com/?p=49&#038;cpage=1#comment-72819</link>
		<dc:creator>SearchDotNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 05:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danappleman.com/?p=49#comment-72819</guid>
		<description>[...] Dan Appleman takes the .NET focused custom search engine ideaÂ one step further by grabbing a great domain nameÂ for his search engine.Â Now why didnâ€™t I think of that!Â Sometimes thatâ€™s all it takes between a search engine that will get used alot (his) and one that won&#039;t (mine).Â I&#039;d be happy to throw my support over to his, though Iâ€™mÂ keeping my baby.Â The one key difference is I plan to leave my search engine open for others to contribute sites.Â Perhaps the two will complement each other. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dan Appleman takes the .NET focused custom search engine ideaÂ one step further by grabbing a great domain nameÂ for his search engine.Â Now why didnâ€™t I think of that!Â Sometimes thatâ€™s all it takes between a search engine that will get used alot (his) and one that won&#8217;t (mine).Â I&#8217;d be happy to throw my support over to his, though Iâ€™mÂ keeping my baby.Â The one key difference is I plan to leave my search engine open for others to contribute sites.Â Perhaps the two will complement each other. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.580 seconds -->
